CyberSecurityBoard
Sponsor Register Login

CVE-2002-0066

Funk Software Proxy Host 3.x before 3.09A creates a Named Pipe that does not require authentication and is installed with insecure access control, which allows local and possibly remote users to use the Proxy Host's configuration utilities and gain privileges.

Publication date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:00:00 +0000


Cyber News related to CVE-2002-0066

CVE-2005-0066 - The original design of TCP does not check that the TCP Acknowledgement number in an ICMP error message generated by an intermediate router is within the range of possible values for data that has already been acknowledged (aka "TCP ...
11 months ago
CVE-2002-0192 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0193, CVE-2002-1564. Reason: This candidate was published with a description that identified a different vulnerability than what was identified in the original authoritative ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-0066 - Funk Software Proxy Host 3.x before 3.09A creates a Named Pipe that does not require authentication and is installed with insecure access control, which allows local and possibly remote users to use the Proxy Host's configuration utilities and ...
16 years ago
CVE-2002-0390 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0639. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0639. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0639 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1370 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1367. Reason: This CAN was originally assigned for the theft of root certificates in CUPS, but it was later deemed to be a legitimate result of exploiting a different ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1404 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1348. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1348. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1348 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1263 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1295. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1295. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1295 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2194 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1589. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1589. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1589 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2160 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1798. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1798. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1798 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2157 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1660. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1660. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1660 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2151 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1651. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1651. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1651 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2147 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1828. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1828. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1828 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2136 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1590. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1590. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1590 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2135 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1618. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1618. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1618 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1261 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1292. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1292. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1292 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1259 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1286. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1286. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1286 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1234 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0180. Reason: This candidate is a an out-of-band assignment duplicate of CVE-2002-0180. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0180 instead of this candidate. All ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-0828 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0862. Reason: This is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1638 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-2153. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-2153. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-2153 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-0646 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0371. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0371. Notes: CVE-2002-0371 should be used instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2005-0067 - The original design of TCP does not require that port numbers be assigned randomly (aka "Port randomization"), which makes it easier for attackers to forge ICMP error messages for specific TCP connections and cause a denial of service, as ...
16 years ago
CVE-2005-0065 - The original design of TCP does not check that the TCP sequence number in an ICMP error message is within the range of sequence numbers for data that has been sent but not acknowledged (aka "TCP sequence number checking"), which makes it ...
16 years ago
CVE-2005-0068 - The original design of ICMP does not require authentication for host-generated ICMP error messages, which makes it easier for attackers to forge ICMP error messages for specific TCP connections and cause a denial of service, as demonstrated using (1) ...
16 years ago
CVE-2004-1060 - Multiple TCP/IP and ICMP implementations, when using Path MTU (PMTU) discovery (PMTUD), allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (network throughput reduction for TCP connections) via forged ICMP ("Fragmentation Needed and Don't ...
6 years ago
CVE-2004-0791 - Multiple TCP/IP and ICMP implementations allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (network throughput reduction for TCP connections) via a blind throughput-reduction attack using spoofed Source Quench packets, aka the "ICMP Source ...
6 years ago

Latest Cyber News


Cyber Trends (last 7 days)


Trending Cyber News (last 7 days)