CyberSecurityBoard
Sponsor Register Login

CVE-2002-0669

The web interface for Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 allows administrators to cause a denial of service by modifying the SIP_AUTHENTICATE_SCHEME value to force authentication of incoming calls, which does not notify the user when an authentication failure occurs.

Publication date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:28:00 +0000


Cyber News related to CVE-2002-0669

10 of the biggest zero-day attacks of 2023 - Here are 10 of the biggest zero-day attacks of 2023 in chronological order. Zero-day attacks started strong in 2023 with CVE-2023-0669, a pre-authentication command injection vulnerability in Fortra's GoAnywhere managed file transfer product. ...
10 months ago Techtarget.com
CVE-2002-0192 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0193, CVE-2002-1564. Reason: This candidate was published with a description that identified a different vulnerability than what was identified in the original authoritative ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-0669 - The web interface for Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 allows administrators to cause a denial of service by modifying the SIP_AUTHENTICATE_SCHEME value to force authentication of incoming calls, which does not ...
11 months ago
CVE-2002-0390 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0639. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0639. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0639 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1370 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1367. Reason: This CAN was originally assigned for the theft of root certificates in CUPS, but it was later deemed to be a legitimate result of exploiting a different ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1404 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1348. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1348. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1348 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1263 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1295. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1295. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1295 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2194 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1589. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1589. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1589 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2160 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1798. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1798. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1798 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2157 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1660. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1660. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1660 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2151 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1651. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1651. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1651 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2147 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1828. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1828. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1828 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2136 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1590. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1590. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1590 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2135 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1618. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1618. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1618 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1261 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1292. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1292. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1292 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1259 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1286. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1286. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1286 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1234 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0180. Reason: This candidate is a an out-of-band assignment duplicate of CVE-2002-0180. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0180 instead of this candidate. All ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-0828 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0862. Reason: This is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1638 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-2153. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-2153. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-2153 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-0646 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0371. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0371. Notes: CVE-2002-0371 should be used instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this ...
54 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2020-0668 - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0669, CVE-2020-0670, CVE-2020-0671, ...
2 years ago
CVE-2020-0672 - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0668, CVE-2020-0669, ...
3 years ago
CVE-2020-0671 - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0668, CVE-2020-0669, ...
3 years ago
CVE-2020-0669 - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0668, CVE-2020-0670, CVE-2020-0671, ...
3 years ago
CVE-2020-0670 - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0668, CVE-2020-0669, ...
3 years ago

Latest Cyber News


Cyber Trends (last 7 days)


Trending Cyber News (last 7 days)