CVE-2002-2191

Lotus Domino 5.0.9a and earlier, even when configured with the 'DominoNoBanner1' option, allows remote attackers to obtain potential sensitive information such as the version via a request for a non-existent .nsf database, which leaks the version in the HTTP banner. This issue is present on Lotus Domino Server with the 'DominoNoBanner' set to a value of '1'.

Publication date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:00:00 +0000


Cyber News related to CVE-2002-2191

CVE-2024-26863 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ...
1 year ago
CVE-2024-36927 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb() KMSAN reported uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb() [1]. __ip_make_skb() tests HDRINCL to know if the skb has icmphdr. However, ...
1 year ago Tenable.com
CVE-2024-26857 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ...
1 year ago
CVE-2024-35973 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ...
11 months ago
CVE-2002-0192 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0193, CVE-2002-1564. Reason: This candidate was published with a description that identified a different vulnerability than what was identified in the original authoritative ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2191 - Lotus Domino 5.0.9a and earlier, even when configured with the 'DominoNoBanner1' option, allows remote attackers to obtain potential sensitive information such as the version via a request for a non-existent .nsf database, which leaks the ...
16 years ago
CVE-2002-0390 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0639. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0639. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0639 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1370 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1367. Reason: This CAN was originally assigned for the theft of root certificates in CUPS, but it was later deemed to be a legitimate result of exploiting a different ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1404 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1348. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1348. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1348 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1263 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1295. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1295. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1295 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2194 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1589. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1589. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1589 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2160 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1798. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1798. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1798 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2157 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1660. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1660. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1660 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2151 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1651. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1651. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1651 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2147 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1828. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1828. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1828 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2136 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1590. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1590. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1590 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-2135 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1618. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1618. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1618 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1261 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1292. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1292. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1292 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1259 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1286. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1286. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1286 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1234 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0180. Reason: This candidate is a an out-of-band assignment duplicate of CVE-2002-0180. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0180 instead of this candidate. All ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-0828 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0862. Reason: This is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-1638 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-2153. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-2153. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-2153 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2002-0646 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0371. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0371. Notes: CVE-2002-0371 should be used instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2005-3397 - Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Comersus BackOffice allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the error parameter to comersus_backoffice_supportError.asp. NOTE: the comersus_backoffice_message.asp/message vector ...
16 years ago
CVE-2012-2191 - IBM Global Security Kit (aka GSKit) before 8.0.14.22, as used in IBM Rational Directory Server, IBM Tivoli Directory Server, and other products, does not properly validate data during execution of a protection mechanism against the Vaudenay SSL CBC ...
7 years ago