Lotus Domino 6.5.0 and 6.5.1, with IMAP enabled, allows remote authenticated users to change their quota by using the IMAP setquota command.
Publication date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 09:00:00 +0000
Cyber News related to CVE-2004-0669
10 of the biggest zero-day attacks of 2023 - Here are 10 of the biggest zero-day attacks of 2023 in chronological order. Zero-day attacks started strong in 2023 with CVE-2023-0669, a pre-authentication command injection vulnerability in Fortra's GoAnywhere managed file transfer product. ...
1 year ago Techtarget.com
CVE-2004-1159 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-1122, CVE-2004-1314. Reason: this was an out-of-band assignment duplicate intended for one issue, but the description and references inadvertently combined multiple issues. ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-0868 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0866. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-0866. Notes: The description for CVE-2004-0866 was inadvertently attached to this issue instead. All CVE users should ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-0669 - Lotus Domino 6.5.0 and 6.5.1, with IMAP enabled, allows remote authenticated users to change their quota by using the IMAP setquota command. ...
7 years ago
CVE-2004-1060 - Multiple TCP/IP and ICMP implementations, when using Path MTU (PMTU) discovery (PMTUD), allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (network throughput reduction for TCP connections) via forged ICMP ("Fragmentation Needed and Don't ...
6 years ago
CVE-2004-0791 - Multiple TCP/IP and ICMP implementations allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (network throughput reduction for TCP connections) via a blind throughput-reduction attack using spoofed Source Quench packets, aka the "ICMP Source ...
6 years ago
CVE-2004-0790 - Multiple TCP/IP and ICMP implementations allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reset TCP connections) via spoofed ICMP error messages, aka the "blind connection-reset attack." NOTE: CVE-2004-0790, CVE-2004-0791, and ...
6 years ago
CVE-2004-0874 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-1123. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-1123. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-1123 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-2404 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-2347. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-2347. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-2347 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-2285 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-2022. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-2022. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-2022 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-2141 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-1827. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-1827. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-1827 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-1479 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0928. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-0928. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0928 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-0973 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0457. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-0457. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0457 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-0955 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0599. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-0599 (the first item listed in that candidate). Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0599 instead of ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-0954 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0597. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-0597. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0597 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-0910 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0815. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-0815. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0815 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-0585 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0589. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-0589. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0589 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-1886 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-1848. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-1848. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-1848 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-0187 - Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0185. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2004-0185. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0185 instead of this candidate. All references and ...
55 years ago Tenable.com
CVE-2004-0444 - Multiple vulnerabilities in SYMDNS.SYS for Symantec Norton Internet Security and Professional 2002 through 2004, Norton Personal Firewall 2002 through 2004, Norton AntiSpam 2004, Client Firewall 5.01 and 5.1.1, and Client Security 1.0 through 2.0 ...
7 years ago
CVE-2004-0445 - The SYMDNS.SYS driver in Symantec Norton Internet Security and Professional 2002 through 2004, Norton Personal Firewall 2002 through 2004, Norton AntiSpam 2004, Client Firewall 5.01 and 5.1.1, and Client Security 1.0 through 2.0 allows remote ...
7 years ago
CVE-2020-0668 - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0669, CVE-2020-0670, CVE-2020-0671, ...
3 years ago
CVE-2020-0672 - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0668, CVE-2020-0669, ...
3 years ago
CVE-2020-0671 - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0668, CVE-2020-0669, ...
3 years ago
CVE-2020-0669 - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-0668, CVE-2020-0670, CVE-2020-0671, ...
3 years ago