CVE-2022-50396

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: sched: fix memory leak in tcindex_set_parms Syzkaller reports a memory leak as follows: ==================================== BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810c287f00 (size 256): comm "syz-executor105", pid 3600, jiffies 4294943292 (age 12.990s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff814cf9f0>] kmalloc_trace+0x20/0x90 mm/slab_common.c:1046 [<ffffffff839c9e07>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:576 [inline] [<ffffffff839c9e07>] kmalloc_array include/linux/slab.h:627 [inline] [<ffffffff839c9e07>] kcalloc include/linux/slab.h:659 [inline] [<ffffffff839c9e07>] tcf_exts_init include/net/pkt_cls.h:250 [inline] [<ffffffff839c9e07>] tcindex_set_parms+0xa7/0xbe0 net/sched/cls_tcindex.c:342 [<ffffffff839caa1f>] tcindex_change+0xdf/0x120 net/sched/cls_tcindex.c:553 [<ffffffff8394db62>] tc_new_tfilter+0x4f2/0x1100 net/sched/cls_api.c:2147 [<ffffffff8389e91c>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x4dc/0x5d0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6082 [<ffffffff839eba67>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x87/0x1d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540 [<ffffffff839eab87>] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline] [<ffffffff839eab87>] netlink_unicast+0x397/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 [<ffffffff839eb046>] netlink_sendmsg+0x396/0x710 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 [<ffffffff8383e796>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] [<ffffffff8383e796>] sock_sendmsg+0x56/0x80 net/socket.c:734 [<ffffffff8383eb08>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x178/0x410 net/socket.c:2482 [<ffffffff83843678>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xa8/0x110 net/socket.c:2536 [<ffffffff838439c5>] __sys_sendmmsg+0x105/0x330 net/socket.c:2622 [<ffffffff83843c14>] __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline] [<ffffffff83843c14>] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2648 [inline] [<ffffffff83843c14>] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x24/0x30 net/socket.c:2648 [<ffffffff84605fd5>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<ffffffff84605fd5>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<ffffffff84800087>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd ==================================== Kernel uses tcindex_change() to change an existing filter properties. Yet the problem is that, during the process of changing, if `old_r` is retrieved from `p->perfect`, then kernel uses tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash() to newly allocate filter results, uses tcindex_filter_result_init() to clear the old filter result, without destroying its tcf_exts structure, which triggers the above memory leak. To be more specific, there are only two source for the `old_r`, according to the tcindex_lookup(). `old_r` is retrieved from `p->perfect`, or `old_r` is retrieved from `p->h`. * If `old_r` is retrieved from `p->perfect`, kernel uses tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash() to newly allocate the filter results. Then `r` is assigned with `cp->perfect + handle`, which is newly allocated. So condition `old_r && old_r != r` is true in this situation, and kernel uses tcindex_filter_result_init() to clear the old filter result, without destroying its tcf_exts structure * If `old_r` is retrieved from `p->h`, then `p->perfect` is NULL according to the tcindex_lookup(). Considering that `cp->h` is directly copied from `p->h` and `p->perfect` is NULL, `r` is assigned with `tcindex_lookup(cp, handle)`, whose value should be the same as `old_r`, so condition `old_r && old_r != r` is false in this situation, kernel ignores using tcindex_filter_result_init() to clear the old filter result. So only when `old_r` is retrieved from `p->perfect` does kernel use tcindex_filter_result_init() to clear the old filter result, which triggers the above memory leak. Considering that there already exists a tc_filter_wq workqueue to destroy the old tcindex_d ---truncated---

Publication date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 13:33:00 +0000


Cyber News related to CVE-2022-50396

CVE-2022-48919 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ...
1 year ago
CVE-2022-50396 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ...
3 months ago
CVE-2024-50396 - A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers to obtain secret data or modify memory. We have already fixed ...
1 year ago Tenable.com
31 Alarming Identity Theft Statistics for 2024 - Identity theft is a prevalent issue that affects millions of people annually. Although the numbers are startling, we've selected the 31 most concerning identity theft statistics to help you understand how to secure your identity. In 2022, the FTC ...
2 years ago Pandasecurity.com
SecurityWeek Analysis: Over 450 Cybersecurity M&A Deals Announced in 2022 - MSSPs took the lead in cybersecurity M&A in 2022 with twice as many deals as in 2021. An analysis conducted by SecurityWeek shows that more than 450 cybersecurity-related mergers and acquisitions were announced in 2022. In 2022, we tracked a total of ...
2 years ago Securityweek.com
CVE-2022-49911 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ...
8 months ago
CVE-2022-22012 - Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22013, CVE-2022-22014, CVE-2022-29128, CVE-2022-29129, CVE-2022-29130, CVE-2022-29131, CVE-2022-29137, CVE-2022-29139, CVE-2022-29141. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-22013 - Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22012, CVE-2022-22014, CVE-2022-29128, CVE-2022-29129, CVE-2022-29130, CVE-2022-29131, CVE-2022-29137, CVE-2022-29139, CVE-2022-29141. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-22014 - Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22012, CVE-2022-22013, CVE-2022-29128, CVE-2022-29129, CVE-2022-29130, CVE-2022-29131, CVE-2022-29137, CVE-2022-29139, CVE-2022-29141. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-29141 - Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22012, CVE-2022-22013, CVE-2022-22014, CVE-2022-29128, CVE-2022-29129, CVE-2022-29130, CVE-2022-29131, CVE-2022-29137, CVE-2022-29139. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-29131 - Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22012, CVE-2022-22013, CVE-2022-22014, CVE-2022-29128, CVE-2022-29129, CVE-2022-29130, CVE-2022-29137, CVE-2022-29139, CVE-2022-29141. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-29137 - Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22012, CVE-2022-22013, CVE-2022-22014, CVE-2022-29128, CVE-2022-29129, CVE-2022-29130, CVE-2022-29131, CVE-2022-29139, CVE-2022-29141. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-29139 - Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22012, CVE-2022-22013, CVE-2022-22014, CVE-2022-29128, CVE-2022-29129, CVE-2022-29130, CVE-2022-29131, CVE-2022-29137, CVE-2022-29141. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-29128 - Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22012, CVE-2022-22013, CVE-2022-22014, CVE-2022-29129, CVE-2022-29130, CVE-2022-29131, CVE-2022-29137, CVE-2022-29139, CVE-2022-29141. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-29129 - Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22012, CVE-2022-22013, CVE-2022-22014, CVE-2022-29128, CVE-2022-29130, CVE-2022-29131, CVE-2022-29137, CVE-2022-29139, CVE-2022-29141. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-29130 - Windows LDAP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-22012, CVE-2022-22013, CVE-2022-22014, CVE-2022-29128, CVE-2022-29129, CVE-2022-29131, CVE-2022-29137, CVE-2022-29139, CVE-2022-29141. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-21928 - Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-21892, CVE-2022-21958, CVE-2022-21959, CVE-2022-21960, CVE-2022-21961, CVE-2022-21962, CVE-2022-21963. ...
2 years ago
CVE-2022-21963 - Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-21892, CVE-2022-21928, CVE-2022-21958, CVE-2022-21959, CVE-2022-21960, CVE-2022-21961, CVE-2022-21962. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-21962 - Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-21892, CVE-2022-21928, CVE-2022-21958, CVE-2022-21959, CVE-2022-21960, CVE-2022-21961, CVE-2022-21963. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-21961 - Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-21892, CVE-2022-21928, CVE-2022-21958, CVE-2022-21959, CVE-2022-21960, CVE-2022-21962, CVE-2022-21963. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-21960 - Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-21892, CVE-2022-21928, CVE-2022-21958, CVE-2022-21959, CVE-2022-21961, CVE-2022-21962, CVE-2022-21963. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-21959 - Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-21892, CVE-2022-21928, CVE-2022-21958, CVE-2022-21960, CVE-2022-21961, CVE-2022-21962, CVE-2022-21963. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-21958 - Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-21892, CVE-2022-21928, CVE-2022-21959, CVE-2022-21960, CVE-2022-21961, CVE-2022-21962, CVE-2022-21963. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-21892 - Windows Resilient File System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-21928, CVE-2022-21958, CVE-2022-21959, CVE-2022-21960, CVE-2022-21961, CVE-2022-21962, CVE-2022-21963. ...
3 years ago
CVE-2022-37990 - Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-37988, CVE-2022-37991, CVE-2022-37995, CVE-2022-38022, CVE-2022-38037, CVE-2022-38038, CVE-2022-38039. ...
3 years ago