CVE-2024-39488

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64: asm-bug: Add .align 2 to the end of __BUG_ENTRY When CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSEn, we fail to add necessary padding bytes to bug_table entries, and as a result the last entry in a bug table will be ignored, potentially leading to an unexpected panic(). All prior entries in the table will be handled correctly. The arm64 ABI requires that struct fields of up to 8 bytes are naturally-aligned, with padding added within a struct such that struct are suitably aligned within arrays. When CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERPOSEy, the layout of a bug_entry is: struct bug_entry { signed int bug_addr_disp; // 4 bytes signed int file_disp; // 4 bytes unsigned short line; // 2 bytes unsigned short flags; // 2 bytes } ... with 12 bytes total, requiring 4-byte alignment. When CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSEn, the layout of a bug_entry is: struct bug_entry { signed int bug_addr_disp; // 4 bytes unsigned short flags; // 2 bytes < implicit padding > // 2 bytes } ... with 8 bytes total, with 6 bytes of data and 2 bytes of trailing padding, requiring 4-byte alginment. When we create a bug_entry in assembly, we align the start of the entry to 4 bytes, which implicitly handles padding for any prior entries. However, we do not align the end of the entry, and so when CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSEn, the final entry lacks the trailing padding bytes. For the main kernel image this is not a problem as find_bug() doesn't depend on the trailing padding bytes when searching for entries: for (bug __start___bug_table; bug < __stop___bug_table; ++bug) if (bugaddr bug_addr(bug)) return bug; However for modules, module_bug_finalize() depends on the trailing bytes when calculating the number of entries: mod->num_bugs sechdrs[i].sh_size / sizeof(struct bug_entry); ... and as the last bug_entry lacks the necessary padding bytes, this entry will not be counted, e.g. in the case of a single entry: sechdrs[i].sh_size 6 sizeof(struct bug_entry) 8; sechdrs[i].sh_size / sizeof(struct bug_entry) 0; Consequently module_find_bug() will miss the last bug_entry when it does: for (i 0; i < mod->num_bugs; ++i, ++bug) if (bugaddr bug_addr(bug)) goto out; ... which can lead to a kenrel panic due to an unhandled bug. This can be demonstrated with the following module: static int __init buginit(void) { WARN(1, "hello\n"); return 0; } static void __exit bugexit(void) { } module_init(buginit); module_exit(bugexit); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); ... which will trigger a kernel panic when loaded: ------------[ cut here ]------------ hello Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1 Internal error: BRK handler: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: hello(O+) CPU: 0 PID: 50 Comm: insmod Tainted: G O 6.9.1 #8 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE--) pc : buginit+0x18/0x1000 [hello] lr : buginit+0x18/0x1000 [hello] sp : ffff800080533ae0 x29: ffff800080533ae0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000 x26: ffffaba8c4e70510 x25: ffff800080533c30 x24: ffffaba8c4a28a58 x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffff3947c0eab3c0 x20: ffffaba8c4e3f000 x19: ffffaba846464000 x18: 0000000000000006 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffaba8c2492834 x15: 0720072007200720 x14: 0720072007200720 x13: ffffaba8c49b27c8 x12: 0000000000000312 x11: 0000000000000106 x10: ffffaba8c4a0a7c8 x9 : ffffaba8c49b27c8 x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffffaba8c4a0a7c8 x6 : 80000000fffff000 x5 : 0000000000000107 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff3947c0eab3c0 Call trace: buginit+0x18/0x1000 [hello] do_one_initcall+0x80/0x1c8 do_init_module+0x60/0x218 load_module+0x1ba4/0x1d70 __do_sys_init_module+0x198/0x1d0 __arm64_sys_init_module+0x1c/0x28 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114 el0_svc ---truncated---

Publication date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:15:00 +0000


Cyber News related to CVE-2024-39488

AWS LetsEncrypt Lambda: Custom TLS Provider - DZone - Trying to renew ... INFO[0000] Checking certificate for domain 'hackernoon.referrs.me' with arn 'arn:aws:acm:us-east-2:004867756392:certificate/72f872fd-e577-43f4-ae38-6833962630af' INFO[0000] Certificate status is 'ISSUED' INFO[0000] Certificate in ...
2 months ago Feeds.dzone.com
Vulnerability Summary for the Week of March 11, 2024 - Published 2024-03-15 CVSS Score not yet calculated Source & Patch Info CVE-2021-47111416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 PrimaryVendor - Product linux - linux Description In the ...
8 months ago Cisa.gov
CVE-2024-39488 - In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ...
5 months ago
CVE-2023-39488 - PDF-XChange Editor TIF File Parsing Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of PDF-XChange Editor. User interaction is required to exploit this ...
7 months ago Tenable.com
Vulnerability Summary for the Week of March 4, 2024 - Published 2024-03-06 CVSS Score not yet calculated Source & Patch Info CVE-2023-52584416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 PrimaryVendor - ...
9 months ago Cisa.gov
CVE-2024-37051 - GitHub access token could be exposed to third-party sites in JetBrains IDEs after version 2023.1 and less than: IntelliJ IDEA 2023.1.7, 2023.2.7, 2023.3.7, 2024.1.3, 2024.2 EAP3; Aqua 2024.1.2; CLion 2023.1.7, 2023.2.4, 2023.3.5, 2024.1.3, 2024.2 ...
6 months ago Tenable.com
The Top 24 Security Predictions for 2024 - Welcome to the second installment of this comprehensive annual look at global cybersecurity industry predictions from the top security industry vendors, technology magazines, expert thought leaders and many more. Last week, in part one of The Top 24 ...
11 months ago Securityboulevard.com
CVE-2024-9256 - Addressed potential issues where the application could be exposed to a Use-After-Free vulnerability and crash when handling certain checkbox field objects, Doc objects, Annotation objects, or AcroForms, which attackers could exploit to execute remote ...
2 months ago Tenable.com
CVE-2024-9255 - Addressed potential issues where the application could be exposed to a Use-After-Free vulnerability and crash when handling certain checkbox field objects, Doc objects, Annotation objects, or AcroForms, which attackers could exploit to execute remote ...
2 months ago Tenable.com
CVE-2024-9254 - Addressed potential issues where the application could be exposed to a Use-After-Free vulnerability and crash when handling certain checkbox field objects, Doc objects, Annotation objects, or AcroForms, which attackers could exploit to execute remote ...
2 months ago Tenable.com
CVE-2024-9253 - Addressed potential issues where the application could be exposed to a Use-After-Free vulnerability and crash when handling certain checkbox field objects, Doc objects, Annotation objects, or AcroForms, which attackers could exploit to execute remote ...
2 months ago Tenable.com
CVE-2024-9252 - Addressed potential issues where the application could be exposed to a Use-After-Free vulnerability and crash when handling certain checkbox field objects, Doc objects, Annotation objects, or AcroForms, which attackers could exploit to execute remote ...
2 months ago Tenable.com
CVE-2024-9251 - Addressed potential issues where the application could be exposed to a Use-After-Free vulnerability and crash when handling certain checkbox field objects, Doc objects, Annotation objects, or AcroForms, which attackers could exploit to execute remote ...
2 months ago Tenable.com
CVE-2024-9250 - Addressed potential issues where the application could be exposed to a Use-After-Free vulnerability and crash when handling certain checkbox field objects, Doc objects, Annotation objects, or AcroForms, which attackers could exploit to execute remote ...
2 months ago Tenable.com
CVE-2024-9246 - Addressed potential issues where the application could be exposed to a Use-After-Free vulnerability and crash when handling certain checkbox field objects, Doc objects, Annotation objects, or AcroForms, which attackers could exploit to execute remote ...
2 months ago Tenable.com
CVE-2024-9243 - Addressed potential issues where the application could be exposed to a Use-After-Free vulnerability and crash when handling certain checkbox field objects, Doc objects, Annotation objects, or AcroForms, which attackers could exploit to execute remote ...
2 months ago Tenable.com
Securing Gold: Assessing Cyber Threats on Paris 2024 - The next Olympic Games hosted in Paris will take place from 26 July to 11 August 2024, while the Paralympic Games will be carried out from 28 August to 8 September 2024. Paris 2024 estimated the number of spectators for the next edition to be 9,7 ...
11 months ago Blog.sekoia.io
Microsoft Office 2024 now available for Windows and macOS users - As announced earlier in September, starting in Office 2024, Microsoft will also turn off ActiveX controls by default in Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Visio client apps, a measure likely prompted by ActiveX's well-known security issues. Last month, ...
2 months ago Bleepingcomputer.com
Critical Zimbra Postjournal flaw CVE-2024-45519 actively exploited in the wild. Patch it now! - “Beginning on September 28, @Proofpoint began observing attempts to exploit CVE-2024-45519, a remote code execution vulnerability in Zimbra mail servers. Beginning on September 28, @Proofpoint began observing attempts to exploit CVE-2024-45519, ...
2 months ago Securityaffairs.com
The Top 24 Security Predictions for 2024 - For 2024, top topics range from upcoming elections to regional wars to space exploration to advances in AI. And with technology playing a more central role in every area of life, annual cybersecurity prediction reports, cyber industry forecasts and ...
11 months ago Securityboulevard.com
Ransomware Attack Demands Reach a Staggering $5.2m in 2024 - The average extortion demand per ransomware attack was over $5.2m in the first half of 2024, according to a new analysis by Comparitech. This figure was calculated from 56 known ransom demands issued by threat actors from January-June 2024. The ...
5 months ago Infosecurity-magazine.com
Patch Now: Critical Windows Kerberos Bug Bypasses Microsoft Security - Microsoft eased enterprise security teams into 2024 with a relatively light January security update consisting of patches for 48 unique CVEs, just two of which the company identified as being of critical severity. For the second straight month, ...
11 months ago Darkreading.com
Threat Brief: CVE-2024-6387 OpenSSH RegreSSHion Vulnerability - On July 1, 2024, a critical signal handler race condition vulnerability was disclosed in OpenSSH servers on glibc-based Linux systems. Using Palo Alto Networks Xpanse data, we observed 23 million instances of OpenSSH servers including all versions. ...
5 months ago Unit42.paloaltonetworks.com
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Crypto Crime Mid-Year Update | Tripwire - Contrary to what one might expect, aggregate illicit activity on the blockchain decreased 19.6% from H1 2023 to H1 2024, falling from $20.9B to $16.7B. Although ChainAnalysis notes that illicit activity totals will likely rise over time, these ...
2 months ago Tripwire.com
MOVEit Transfer Flaws Push Security Defense Into a Race With Attackers - Attackers appear to be pounding away at a couple of critical bugs that Progress Software disclosed this week in its MOVEit file transfer application, with nearly the same ferocity as they did the zero-day flaw the company disclosed almost exactly a ...
5 months ago Darkreading.com

Latest Cyber News


Cyber Trends (last 7 days)


Trending Cyber News (last 7 days)